Ethics Of The Hellenistic World

In comparing the honorable theories of the Epicureans, Aristotle, and the Stoics its found that they have got tether separate judgments. These ideas are different in their unmarried beliefs; yet attempt to fulfil the same goals of creating an inner calmness and sense of well cosmos in their followers. Generally these three disciplines had distinctly separate ideas on how to set about accomplishing these goals; the Epicureans snarl that the pursuit of joyousness was the castigate path to enlightenment, while the Stoics had the idea that the conformation to strict laws regarding law was the proper path, and as for Aristotle, he held the middle ground in this debate of the minds, feeling that assuagement was the key to complete happiness.\n\nEpicurus morals was a form of egocentric hedonism, meaning that the notwithstanding amour essentially valuable is ones suffer frolic. Anything else that has value is valuable unless as a essence to securing pleasure for oneself. Epicurus associated this theory to a refined and individual passel of the nature of pleasure, which lead him to exhort a virtuous, moderately thrifty action as the opera hat means to securing pleasure. His ethical theories envision a foundation in the Aristotelian commonplace that the highest rock-steady is what is valued for its hold sake, and not for the sake of anything else. Epicurus also hold with Aristotle that happiness is the highest good. However, he disagreed with Aristotle by identifying happiness with pleasure. Epicurus gave two reasons for this. The principal(prenominal) reason was that pleasure is the only thing that people do having value just for its own sake; that is, Epicurus ethical hedonism is found upon his psychological hedonism. Everything we do, he claimed, we do for the sake of ultimately gaining pleasure for ourselves. This is supposedly confirmed by observing the obvious manner of infants, who instinctively pursue pleasure and shun painfulnes s. The truth in this is also found in the behavior of adults, but in adults it is more difficult to stop that this truth, since they have much more complicated beliefs about what ordain bring them pleasure. This hedonism was widely denounced in the ancient world as undermining traditional morality. The trouble with Epicureanism is its arrogance that the self is a mess of natural appetites and passions, and that the end of life is their gratification. Experience shows that such a policy consistently pursued, brings not pleasure but pain to the...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.